Published: Jan. 4, 2022

We last left our intrepid Strand 1 researchers onthe precipice of the incoming classroom datafrom our cross-strand data collection team.As this new data comes in, the Strand 1 teamspent the quarterfacing a new challenge—how exactly willwe use this data to define the capabilities of our AI Partner?

What Can Our AI Partner Hear & Understand?

Before our future AI Partner can help facilitate small groupclassroom collaborations, it’ll need to recognize what students are saying. Strand 1’s Speech Recognition team washard at work this quarter tohelp make this a possibility. Thisgroup of researchers selected five sessions of datasets collected from various Denver Public Schools and St. Vrain ValleySchools middle school classrooms. The team manually transcribed and annotated mark times when each student wasspeaking (to the nearest 0.1 sec). These data are being used toevaluate both background filter performance and diarization
performance using Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) —the process of automatically transcribing audio input.

To facilitate this work, the team installed the recently released SpeechBrain system and provided samples of speechfrom each target student. The team then used the novelapproach of having the system filter out from these samplesegments that do not contain speech from any of the targetspeakers.

The group will continue the current work on filtering background noise and tuning Google ASR for optimum performance, including providing language model context. They willalso be augmenting the existing hardware testing pipeline andbuilding a similar pipeline compatible with cameras.

In conjunction with the Speech Recognition team, the Annotation Working Group and the Content Analysis team are alsopiloting other types of annotation of the students’ utterances. These include astraightforward on-topic/off-topic classification, more Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs),and a layer of Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST). In addition,Strand 1 is engaged in developing a newAMR parsing modelthat will encompass this new, preliminary RST (RST) annotation. Experimental results are expected soon! To parse thestudent dialogues from our classroom datasets, the teamis alsoworking on a few shots learning model—an objectcategorization machine learning model that aims to learn information about object categories from a handful, rather thanhundreds or thousands, oftraining samples. The teams’ bestAMR parsing results so far have been an 81.4% accuracy rateon a medium sized model, and they hope to test larger AMRparser models in the coming weeks.

A graphic showing the different capabilities of our Strand 1 researchers.

Recent Strand 1 advances in AI capabilities

Our Dialogue Management team was also hard at workhelping our future AI Partner understand student speech. Thisquarter, the team worked on two dialogue systems surveys:one that describes currentdialogue models and architecture,and another focused on designing human-centered dialoguesystems. The latter explicitly recognizes the different stake-holders in the dialogue process and focuses on the areas ofend-user needs, design values, and data collection as well asan evaluation of these systems.

What Can Our AI Partner Understand& Do?

As several teams work toward creating the ears and eyes forthe Partner, other Strand 1 teams—with the help of Strands 2and 3—are working to help the Partner understand what todo with this information.The Annotation team worked toward creating annotationsthat will help our AI Partner detectwhich students are working toward the assigned task and which students are off task.

On-task students might be talking about the content of theclass, for example, or they might be talking through a groupassignment. The group alsohopes to annotate “attentiveness”and “mind-wandering,” as well as students who are movingthe conversation forward. As their work progresses, theAnnotation team will work closely with Strand 3 for guidance onsocially relevant annotations, such as inclusivespeech versusharmful speech.

While the Annotation group strives to help our AI Partnerunderstand what constitutes on-topic and off-topic behavior, the Reinforcement Learning (RL)— a machine learningparadigm that allows AI agents to learn how to take actions(i.e., learn policies) in an environment by interacting with it orbyobserving others’ interactions — team focuses on enablingthe AI Partner to learn and improve discourse policies fromreal interactions in theclassroom. The team works closelywith our Strand 2 experts on Collaborative Problem Solvingskills to understand which policies will help the AIPartnerlearn. During this quarter, the RL team developed a new RLapproach that enables them to teach a single agent to learn abasket of policiesinstead of only one. In the coming quarters,the team hopes to adapt their approach to the classroomwith the goal of seeing if they can tune the AIPartner’s behavior on the fly to match teachers’ changing objectives.