Faculty

Ìý

Respondents

1,784Ìý

Possible Respondents

4,742Ìý

Ìý

Response Rate

37.6 %

(+/- 1.83% Margin of Error)

Ìý

Index and Overall Average Scores

The survey results provide both overall scores, as well as engagement index scores. The engagement index score is derived from items on the survey that are most highly correlated with research on engagement.Ìý The following are rated on a 6-point scale:Ìý

Index 4.18

Overall Average 4.51

Ìý

Faculty Survey Categories

Survey Category
(in order of percent favorable response)

% FavorableÌý

Department Collaboration

85.1

Department Leadership

83.1

Alignment

82.7

University Collaboration

81.1

College Dean

74.4

Growth

72.7

Recognition

70.7

Resources

68.6

Compensation and Rewards

65.8

Quality/Innovation

65.6

Executive Leadership

59.7

Ìý

Faculty Engagement Score

Percent FavorabilityÌýis significantly different (p<.05) from the category average, where:

= HighÌý Ìý = Low

Faculty Engagement Item
(in order of performance)

% Favorable

Willing to put in extra effort to help CU Â鶹ӰԺ be successful

95.0Ìý

Proud to be associated with CU Â鶹ӰԺ

93.0Ìý

Association with CU Â鶹ӰԺ has enriched my career

90.9Ìý

Would recommend CU Â鶹ӰԺ as a good place to work

88.0Ìý

Overall satisfaction with my experiences at CU Â鶹ӰԺ

83.7

Feel a strong sense of belonging to CU Â鶹ӰԺ

73.6ÌýÌý

CU Â鶹ӰԺ helps keep me passionate about my higher ed. career

72.4Ìý

Not seriously considered leaving CU Â鶹ӰԺ for another position

60.3ÌýÌý

Faculty Engagement

82.2

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Most Favorable Survey Items

Percent FavorabilityÌýis significantly different (p<.05) from the category average, where:

= HighÌý Ìý = Low

Survey Category
(in order of highest percent favorable)

% FavorableÌý

Ìý

I love the Â鶹ӰԺ region. [Alignment]

94.4Ìý

CU Â鶹ӰԺ faculty are open to sharing innovative ideas with one another. [University Collaboration]

90.0Ìý

Faculty in my academic unit treat each other with respect. [Department Collaboration]

86.8

Faculty and staff have a mutual respect for one another and work well together. [Department Collaboration]

86.5

I love working for CU Â鶹ӰԺ. [Alignment]

86.1Ìý

I trust other faculty members in my academic unit.ÌýÌý[Department Collaboration]

86.0

Faculty members' actions support CU Â鶹ӰԺ's vision and strategic imperatives. [Alignment]

85.8Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý ÌýÌý

Least Favorable Survey Items

Percent FavorabilityÌýis significantly different (p<.05) from the category average, where:

= HighÌý Ìý = Low

Survey Category
(in order of lowest percent favorable)

% Favorable

The executive leadership at CU Â鶹ӰԺ is accessible to faculty members. [Executive Leadership]

50.5Ìý

Considering higher education settings, I feel my pay is competitive. [Compensation and Rewards]

51.8Ìý

The executive leadership shares the reasons why key decisions are made with faculty. [Executive Leadership]

52.5Ìý

CU Â鶹ӰԺ rewards its faculty members for excellence in service. [Recognition]

53.9Ìý

The executive leadership at CU Â鶹ӰԺ communicates effectively with faculty members. [Executive Leadership]

54.0Ìý

CU Â鶹ӰԺ rewards its faculty members for excellence in teaching. [Recognition]

58.6Ìý

At UC Â鶹ӰԺ, failures are seen as opportunities for learning and growth. [Quality/Innovation]

60.4Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Engagement by:

Length of Service

Length of ServiceÌý % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Less than 1 year (n=200) 93.1Ìý
1 to 2 years (n=246) 86.2
3 to 5 years (n=328) 83.8
6 to 10 years (n=322) 78.8
11 to 15 years (n=218) 77.5
16 to 20 years (n=162) 80.9
More than 20 years (n=248) 81.8
Prefer not to answer (n=54) 63.2Ìý

Ìý

Age Group

Age Group % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
20 to 29 (n=131) 89.7ÌýÌý
30 to 39 (n=492) 84.1
40 to 49 (n=448) 80.3
50 to 59 (n=383) 80.9
60 to 64 (n=122) 84.1
65 or over (n=105) 86.0
Prefer not to answer (n=97) 70.2Ìý

Ìý

Disability Status

Disability Status % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Disability Identification-No (n=1,602) 83.6
Disability Identification-Yes (n=53) 70.8Ìý
Prefer not to answer (n=106) 65.3Ìý

Ìý

Percent Favorability is significantly different (p<.05) from the item’s overall category average; CU-B Average; where,

= HighÌý Ìý = Low

Race Category

Race Category % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
American Indian and Alaska Native (n=11)Ìý 81.8
Asian (n=143) 80.8
White (n=1,358) 72.6Ìý
Hispanic or Latino (n=89) 72.3Ìý
Black or African American (n=22) 71.6
Other (n=22) 69.6
Prefer not to answer (n=184) 63.3Ìý

Ìý

Gender

Gender % Favorable Response on Engagement Items
Man (n=889) 83.6
Woman (n=758) 83.0
Gender Diverse (n=14) 72.1
Prefer not to answer (n=111) 66.3Ìý

Ìý