Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria Header Image

The final idea submission is only 1,000 words. So, evaluation team members will look for indications, but not lengthy descriptions, that use the below criteria as a guide for drafting an idea.

Student Centered

Student Centered Icon Image
Must Have:

  • Does the proposed idea impact undergraduate students in the College of Arts & Sciences?
  • Does the proposed idea integrate A&S undergraduate students as team members or design partners?
  • Does the proposed idea promote active and/or experiential learning?

Nice to Have:

  • Does the proposed idea enable students to develop knowledge, skills, and values from direct experiences outside of a traditional academic setting?

Boundary Breaking

Boundary Breaking Icon Image

Must Have:

  • Is the team composed of members from across the college including students, staff, and faculty of varying appointments?

  • Does the proposed idea demonstrate how diverse voices and contributions will be valued on the team?

  • Does the proposed idea envision novel integrations of technology with pedagogy to promote impactful learning?

Nice to Have:

  • Does the proposed idea have the potential to cross disciplinary boundaries?

Actionable

Actionable Icon Image
Must Have:

  • Is the proposed idea feasible given current or anticipated technology in the next 3-5 years?
  • Does the proposed idea consider the sustainability of the project over time?
  • Does the proposed idea offer pragmatic ways to realize this vision?

Nice to Have:

  • Does the proposed idea take into account how potential institutional barriers will be navigated on behalf of the project?

Scalable

Scalable Icon Image

Must Have:

  • Does the proposed idea demonstrate widespread impact on undergraduate students?

  • Does the proposed idea articulate how the project鈥檚 impact will be measured?

Nice to Have:

  • Does the proposed idea have the potential to scale, eventually, across the college?