Published: Oct. 12, 2015

People who believe that climate change is increasing the risk of devastating wildfires in Colorado are no more likely to take mitigation actions to protect their property, a new study led by researchers at the 麻豆影院 and the U.S. Forest Service has found.

The study, which was recently in the journal Environmental Hazards, examined the role that climate change beliefs play in a homeowner鈥檚 choice to undertake risk mitigation activities such as installing a fire-resistant roof to reduce the ignitability of their home or thinning surrounding vegetation that could act as a potential fuel source. 听听

Respondents in the study were placed on a continuum from 鈥榖eliever鈥 to 鈥榮keptic鈥 based on their attitudes about the degree to which climate change affects wildfire risk in Colorado.听 Although over half of the study respondents agreed that climate change has increased wildfire risk in the state, those respondents were not necessarily more likely to take action on their private property to mitigate potential damage from future blazes.

The researchers did, however, find a correlation between climate change denial and risk mitigation actions.听

鈥淎 small but distinct portion of respondents who reject climate science as a 鈥榟oax鈥 are also the ones who reported doing significantly more risk mitigation activities than other respondents,鈥 said Hannah Brenkert-Smith, a research associate in the Institute of Behavioral Sciences at CU-麻豆影院 and lead author of the study.听

The findings suggest that attitudes and actions related to climate change and risk mitigation are more nuanced than they are often portrayed in the media, and that focusing on locally relevant hazards may be a more useful tool for educating and galvanizing residents in fire-prone areas of Colorado.

鈥淭he conventional wisdom that a belief about climate change is a pre-requisite for mitigating local climate change impacts was not found in this analysis,鈥 said study co-author Patricia Champ of the U.S. Forest Service鈥檚 Rocky Mountain Research Station. 鈥淭his was a bit of a surprise.鈥

麻豆影院 and Larimer counties of Colorado, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and the Colorado State Forest Service provided funding for the study.听 James Meldrum, a research associate in Institute of Behavioral Science at CU-麻豆影院, co-authored the paper.

This is a joint release with the U.S. Forest Service.

Contact:
Hannah Brenkert-Smith, 303-492-5743
hannahb@colorado.edu
Jennifer Hayes, U.S. Forest Service media relations, 970-498-1365
jenniferhayes@fs.fed.us
Trent Knoss, CU-麻豆影院 media relations, 303-735-0528
trent.knoss@colorado.edu

A view of a wildfire burning in the Four Mile Canyon area west of 麻豆影院 from an overlook in Louisville, Colorado on September 6, 2010. (Photo by Glenn Asakawa/University of Colorado)