Judge slaps ban on Newsweek and reporter who ID'd juror in a tweet.
Twitter is like that popular girl 聽you didn鈥檛 trust but you made friends with anyway. 聽Her friendship got you a place at the cool cafeteria table, but one bad move and you聽were聽stuck by yourself with your sack lunch.
A respected and experienced Newsweek reporter made a bad move on Twitter Thursday in the mad scramble to report the theater shooting trial verdict. Now Nina Burleigh is taking her lumps over a split-second decision social media blunder.
Judge Carlos Samour put out an official order banning her聽and any other Newsweek reporter from the courthouse for the duration of the trial.
鈥淣ewsweek and its reporters should have known better,鈥� he wrote.
Juror 737鈥檚 voice was trembling yesterday as he told a closed courtroom that he had been ID鈥檈d in the tweet by Newsweek. 聽The tweet had a link to a story, which also ID鈥檈d him, on the guilty verdict rendered by the jury. 聽His name was tweeted in cyberspace and then broadcast over and over.
These jurors have a serious job to do in these next couple of weeks. They are deciding whether the convicted theater shooter will die for killing 12 people and injuring 70 three years ago. 聽The extra stress now that many people know his name is likely keeping 737 up at night.
The defense is livid about the gaffe. 聽Holmes鈥� attorneys are likely worried that 737 will lose his objectivity. Anonymity breeds security; but, now that the light is shining on 聽him, 聽there may be invisible pressure to vote for the shooter鈥檚 death because that鈥檚 what society wants for him to do.
James Holmes public defenders know he is a pariah. During jury selection, they specifically asked prospective jurors if they would have any qualms about making the unpopular decision of letting him live out his life in prison as opposed to killing him.
鈥淭his will be an appellate issue,鈥� predicts former prosecutor Bob Grant. 鈥淚鈥檓 surprised the judge didn鈥檛 put somebody in jail.鈥�
The broader issue is how we as journalists deal with the powerful tattletale that is Twitter.
The answer聽鈥斅爓e need to think before we tweet.
The immediacy of Twitter is a temptation for reporters who want to be first. 聽Our editors encourage us to get the word out right away. 聽But is five minutes of thought and cross-checking really all that long? 聽If you are the only one to break the news, why the worry that someone else will beat you?
And if a dozen other journalists are scrambling to be first with the same news, then who cares if you鈥檙e sixth? It鈥檚 not worth getting the facts wrong.
It鈥檚 ironic that this would happen to Juror 737. He is perhaps the most unlikely juror, as he is a Columbine survivor who was once close to the the killers; and after that friendship lapsed, ended up taking one of the victims to prom the week before she was killed. F
urther, he is not just one of the 12, 聽he is the foreman. 聽He knows about the media. He knows about mental illness. He knows about tragedy. And he does know about how the media works because Columbine was an international story for months.
It鈥檚 true, there are more important issues. 聽Like death and vengeance and mental illness and guns and sorrow and loss. 聽Newsweek鈥檚 Nina Burleigh is not the person on trial here. 聽But on a slow day at the courthouse as the jury deliberates the aggravating factors in phase 1, it鈥檚 worth taking a look at the roll that Twitter is taking on our profession and how we can from finding ourselves ashamed and feeling responsible when our only real responsibility as journalists is to be a messenger.
You can find the official court order here: